A Model for Processing Illocutionary Structures and Argumentation in Debates
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we briefly present the objectives of Inference Anchoring Theory (IAT) and the formal structure which is proposed for dialogues. Then, we introduce our development corpus, and a computational model designed for the identification of discourse minimal units in the context of argumentation and the illocutionary force associated with each unit. We show the categories of resources which are needed and how they can be reused in different contexts.
منابع مشابه
Towards Argument Mining from Dialogue
Argument mining has started to yield early results in automatic analysis of text to produce representations of reason-conclusion structures. This paper addresses for the first time the question of automatically extracting such structures from dialogical settings of argument. More specifically, we introduce theoretical foundations for dialogical argument mining as well as show the initial implem...
متن کاملBuilding arguments with argumentation: the role of illocutionary force in computational models of argument
Chris REED a 1, Simon WELLS , Katarzyna BUDZYŃSKA b,a and Joseph DEVEREUX a a School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK b Institute of Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Poland Abstract. This paper builds upon the proposed dialogical extensions to the AIF, termed AIF+, by making explicit the representation of the role of illocutionary force in the connection...
متن کاملStructure of persuasive communication and elaboration likelihood model
The aim of the paper is to propose a framework for the structure of persuasive communication based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) by Petty and Cacioppo, the Inference Anchoring Theory (IAT) by Budzynska and Reed and the Interpersonal (IP-) Argumentation Model by Budzynska. The ELM suggests that there are two routes to persuasion: central and peripheral. IAT assumes that communication...
متن کاملAgent Argumentation with Opinions and Advice
In argumentation-based negotiation the rhetorical illocutionary particles Appeals, Rewards and Threats have implications for the players that extend beyond a single negotiation and are concerned with building (business) relationships. This paper extends an agent’s relationship-building argumentative repertoire with Opinions and Advice. A framework is described that enables agents to model their...
متن کاملParleda: a Library for Parallel Processing in Computational Geometry Applications
ParLeda is a software library that provides the basic primitives needed for parallel implementation of computational geometry applications. It can also be used in implementing a parallel application that uses geometric data structures. The parallel model that we use is based on a new heterogeneous parallel model named HBSP, which is based on BSP and is introduced here. ParLeda uses two main lib...
متن کامل